AT&T vs Verizon

A few months back I was looking at switching providers. For a couple of days I had two Galaxy Note 2 phones. One on Verizon, and one on AT&T.  I decided to do some “speed/performance” testing.  While traveling between Pennsylvania and Baltimore I conducted numerous performance tests against Speedtest.net.

I figured I wouldn’t likely have the opportunity to do so with the exact same phone.  So what were the results? You can see for yourself with the attached spreadsheets. But I’ll give a personal summary.

SUMMARY – basically, along most of the highway route Verizon had better speeds. Being a lot closer to a 10mb/s average.  AT&T seemed to fall into the 3-5mb/s far more regularly.  However, near both my work and home I encountered reception issues. This made me decide to remain with AT&T, even though along most of the highway and most areas I travelled, Verizon had better performance than AT&T. That said, at one spot near the I-83/I-695 junction, AT&T exceeded 56 mb/s. For reference, 18mb/s was the top speed I achieved on Verizon.

So which network is better? Well, as you can see, it depends on personal factors. Overall Verizon was superior, but where I personally most needed cell service, AT&T performed better.  Verizon is more consistently in that 10mb/s range. AT&T in some areas really screams at 28mb/s, 50+mb/s.

But here are the data dumbs. Perhaps I might map them sometime.

DOWNLOAD DATA FILES (ods)

AVG Update and Screwing with your Search

I was able to fix most of the search values. Reset default page. Set search bar back to Google. But if I typed in the URL, the search went to AVG.  Argh…

After much searching, found the solution here: http://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/810780

Which was in turn found here http://forums.avg.com/ww-en/avg-free-forum?sec=thread&act=show&id=157513 ,

 

SOLUTION

1) Type in address-bar about:config and press Enter

2) Confirm warning dialog

3) Find keyword.URL (you can use Filter)

4) Change value of keyword.URL to http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&q=

And there you have it, your URL is back.  ;-)

Is Microsoft that Daft? Yes…

Seriously, Steve Ballmer should have been fired years ago. I am hoping it’s very soon. The man is flat out an idiot of a CEO. Why do I feel this way?

1. He has repeatedly failed to see where the market is.

2. He has failed to leverage Microsoft brands and technologies.

3. He has failed to stop infighting and bring about a conducive team inside Microsoft.

4. He has failed to implement common sense “features” while repeatedly implementing immense change.

***

[Please note, I am actually kind of okay with Windows 8. I am sort of getting used to the interface. So please don't view this as a Windows 8 knock. I think it's adventurous and was worth the effort and simply needs some refinement. In fact I jut think they need to incorporate some easy drag n drop arrangement of the new tile screen. And some outlines in metro apps.]

But let me address each of the above:

1. Microsoft is just now pushing into tablets, 4th generation smartphones, and mobile devices in general. Come lately again? Granted Bill Gates nearly missed the internet itself.

2. Failure to leverage Microsoft brands. And to recognize which ones are tarnished and which ones are marketable. I’m going to be point blunt honest here. “Windows” is a tarnished brand; so is IE. Very few people are using Internet Explorer by choice. Even though it’s vastly improved in many ways.

Meanwhile, Microsoft has it’s Xbox and it’s Kinect platform which has an overall strong brand loyalty. I believe it was a mistake for Microsoft to push the Windows Phone platform. Especially, in such an appless environment. It’s not enough to motivate the market.

Rather, an “X Phone” that was branded with the Xbox platform. That had an emulator to play many of the mini-arcade Xbox Live! games. This could have gone somewhere. Yes, it’d need more work. But imagine if the Microsoft phone came out, and while it may have lacked apps, it had a thousand games available at launch. Imagine if it could sync with your Xbox, carry your Live! profile, store your replays of Halo matches. Suddenly, a few million Xbox owners have got a lot more reason to go with Microsoft’s phone. (Ironically, many of these suggestions were sent to Microsoft by myself long before the 360 came out. And they’re still missing the game. Had Microsoft done this back when the 360 came out with their Zune, they might have given Apple a far greater challenge.)

3. Look, I understand Office team, isn’t as fond of Windows team, and neither is as fond of the Xbox/Entertainment branch. Suck it up. A CEO’s job is to make sure the various major divisions of their company are working in synergy. Steve Ballmer repeatedly fails at this. And that’s because of the “pie problem”. Each has their slice of pie and feels at risk. Eliminate the feeling of potential jeopardy so that there can be synergy.

4. Common sense features. Okay, how many stinkin revisions to MS Office do we need? And why can’t I simply schedule a block of time in the calendar and then select “Out of Office”, and automatically have my out-of-office reply turned on ONLY at those times.

Instead, I have to remember to turn it on right before I leave for vacation, turn it back off when I arrived, turn it on a few days later when I might be out for a day, and then remember to turn it back off. Of course, I do none of this remembering. And the feature becomes one of uselessness and guilt.

Logically, one should NEVER set their auto-reply, they should simply set their schedule and denote the status as “out of office”. When that is done, the message should automatically be set. (With an option use a custom message or append a msg to one’s general OOO reply.)

Sadly, this probably won’t make it into Office 2013 either.

***

Please Steve, pass the torch to someone who “can do”.

Adobe’s love of shotguns…

Adobe seems to have a love of shotguns, namely pointing it at itself and/or it’s users and pulling the trigger.

***

I’ve been pretty vocal about my dislike for the present CEO. I sold all my Adobe shares (just to make that clear).  And I really think Adobe is doing EVERYTHING it can to kill itself – which is a shame because they have a lot of good products.

So recently on Slashdot there was a discussion of Adobe’s handling of a Photoshop CS5 bug. Where Adobe’s solution is “Pay us to upgrade to CS6″
https://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb12-11.html

Now some might point out the fact that CS5 was released 2 years ago and CS6 is the second version since CS5 (with CS5.5 in between). But let’s consider whether that is legitimate justification.

CS5 was released in April 2010, followed by CS5.5 in April 2011. CS6 was just released this April. Let’s say you bought the top of the line “Master Chief Suite”.  The upgrade cost from CS5.5 is $550, and from CS5 – over a thousand $$$$.

But let’s say you bought Adobe CS5 suite in March 2011. You’re now on the hook for over a $1,000 just to secure your 14 month old software suite.  That’s pretty damn petty IMHO.

I already dislike how tiered Adobe’s upgrade path has become.  Essentially they’ve kept the the high upgrade price while moving to a shorter upgrade cycle. And tiering the upgrade based on the version.  But it used to be that upgrades were available to the last two cycles. And I think it should still be that way.  Instead, Adobe is trying to get $500/year, every year from it’s users.

Why this is bad?  $500/year isn’t bad if you’re an active business with a high production rate.  But it’s very bad if you’re an independent or part time user (ie: many of us with a 40 hour a week day job that DOESN’T use Adobe products) and you just want to stay in the game and stay current with Adobe technology and do the odd job here and there.   It then becomes cost prohibitive; and why is this bad? Because it means people like me will fall behind on Adobe’s technology platform and cease maintaining the skillset,  in other words, shrinking of Adobe’s developer base – and that’s a VERY BAD thing.

Adobe is becoming an extremely greedy company under it’s current leadership; and a foolish one to boot.  I’ve long advocated for the removal of Adobe’s current CEO and a replacement with someone who better understands the present digital world.

SOLUTION: Release a reduced developer edition of CS Master Suite. The developer edition requires that you sign-up as an individual programmer. It gives you a limited license. Full featured, but you can only produce personal or not-for-profit products.   Make it cheap!

This is similar to the licensing that Adobe did with giving away Flex Builder in 2009 to anyone who was unemployed.  That was a REALLY cool thing, and I give Adobe HUGE Kudos for that. 

Adobe’s Flash, although oft criticized has a tremendous amount going for it technology wise. But it’s been mis-marketed, managed, and like Coldfusion is kept from it’s potential.  I truly believe Adobe is going in a direction that will ultimately lead to it’s eventual demise/purchase within a decade’s time. Where as I believe that Adobe if it were to take advantage of certain opportunities in his playing hand could propel itself to a position of near rivalry with Apple and Microsoft.  But so far, I haven’t seen them do ANY of the right decisions they need to do for that.

:-(

 

Dear TV Network

When are you guys going to stop being stupid?

Seriously, I do not understand why all of you networks “just don’t get it”.

1. Internet programming – I will never buy cable again. I watch a handful of shows and am tired of paying $150 for mostly nothing I want to watch.

2. Discovery Channel is actually one of the content providers that has shows that I want to watch. (ie: Dual Survival & American Chopper)

3. I am a busy computer programmer with 3 children under the age of 5. This is not the 1950′s, I don’t get to come home after a long day at work and just sit in front of the ‘tube.

My TV viewing is sporadic. I might watch 2-3 episodes of a show in a row as I do bills, and other tasks.  I want to watch my shows when I want to watch them.  And just what do you think happens to a viewer who misses a few episodes of a linear show?  We quit watching, that’s what.

3. Networks seem afraid to make all shows available. Often they only have 1-4 of the most current shows of the season. The problem, I might go a whole month and not get the free time to watch one of my favorite shows, and then I’ll watch 5.  But they’re not available…WHY?  What are you losing? Quit with the stupid licensing.

4. TV Everywhere….my preferred method of watching TV is streaming through my Xbox or iPhone (and/or outputting it from my iPhone to a TV).  Please allow for this easily.

And stop with stupid “this show isn’t licensed for playback on devices”. That’s just stupid. What difference does it make if I watch the show on my computer, my phone or streaming through my Xbox/Roku.

5. Commercials – I really don’t mind commercials, as long as they’re not too excessive. In fact, I often like commercials. What I don’t like seeing is the same commercial 5 times.  But I really like it when a company sponsors a particular show, and then has 3-4 unique commercials.

But seriously, don’t think commercials are the big problem. I’d much prefer easy access and availability with a few more commercials.

6. Quit lying in bed with Comcast and other cable networks. They’re not the future – WE ARE!!!

Seriously, my understanding is that Comcast pays the average network between $1-$3.  Well, I’d be willing to pay $2/month for the Discovery or History Channel.  But I’m not going to pay a ton per episode.  iTunes wants to charge $2 an episode. That’s $2 for what I could mostly get free, and for what I am unlikely to ever watch again. And why pay $24 for a season of a show. When if I buy it on DVD I can at least re-sell it and have a hard copy.

No, keep it simple.  Do a flat rate (no more than $5/month) for the entire network. And $2 per show per season. Remember, you can still make money on commercials.

7. Remember, I like your shows, I want to watch your shows. Keep it easy and flexible. Let me watch the way I want, where I want, when I want and how I want. The result is you’ll get a lot more viewership. Oh, and guess what’s great about the internet. No survey and guestimate on rating. You’ll know every view. And if you got reall smart you’d start linking the ads right from the TV show.

***
If your old AARP CEOs don’t get the above, then they need to be fired/retired, and replaced with someone who understands the internet.  I don’t care if they’re 20 or 70, as long as they understand the internet, and modern day American lifestyle – the fact that things have changed.

QR code, Google believes it’s a buffalo. But Google’s wrong!

Google Kills Off Those Little Square Codes You Scan With Your Phone
http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-03-31/tech/29979593_1_qr-codes-android-nfc-forum

Why Google is completely and moronically wrong….

NFC tech has it’s uses, buy a coke from a vending machine.  Hoorah! But seriously, the appeal of the QR code is the simplicity in use and creation – it’s ubiquitous. 

ANYONE, and I mean ANYONE can create a QR code. Heck, an artist can even paint one on a wall.  If a deli shop wants to, they can create one for their menu. Put them on flyers, and post them around town. It can even be a coupon.

But NFC, where am I going to get a chip.  How am I going to embed that into my resume when I send it off? How is an add in a magazine going to place that NFC chip in the page? How is it not going to be confused by 50 other NFCs in all the other ads?

Seriously, this is a brain fart on the part of Google.  Not to demean NFCs in any way. More tech the better.  And it’s probably just what we need for more advanced transactions. But I view the two technologies as complimentary, rather than exclusive. Both serve different roles and have their advantages.

 
Google Kills Off Those Little Square Codes You Scan With Your Phone

A friend posted about Code Warm up level challenge

Well, I didn’t have much time. And haven’t free coded in ages. I had an idea but it didn’t work perfectly. Tried to do just a mock-up and even that ran into trouble. (For whatever reason, my Level Up code is broken. It was working 20 minutes ago. But now _levelUp += 1; suddenly becomes 128. Er huh what? Went to debug, but no longer have Flash Debug version thanks to last update.

Anyways, the concept is to get away from all the typical level up bars. I mean it’s almost a guarantee that an RPG is going to use a level up bar or a pie. But why? It is probably the simplest way to convey a level. But it’s definitely not original.

My thought was to use the color spectrum. We know how primary/secondary color circles work. Red, to orange, to yellow, to green, to blue, to purple.  So theoretically you can show a progression via color change.  Furthermore, standard RGB has something like 16,000,000+ colors. So right off the bat you have an XP system that can handle 16 million experience points.

http://easternstorm.net/sassie/colorleveler/ColorLeveler.html

Not sure, whether I would implement a different color shift for a level or if I would have each level go through the entire shift. And use a level multiplier to handle the XP. (ie: Level 1 only needs 1,600 XP.)  Well there you have it, food for thought.

It was fun to code even though I kept finding myself hitting hurdles. That is until I hit the += bug.  Seriously, WHAT THE HECK am I doing wrong. Source code is available. It’s probably some stupid typo or goof. Having been coding ActionScript in a while. Rusty.
More info over here on the code warmup…

http://codewarmup.jessefreeman.com/


June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.